Sephora and Ulta Beauty Are Playing Different Games—and Both Are Winning

Sephora and Ulta Beauty Are Playing Different Games—and Both Are Winning

In today’s fragmented beauty retail landscape, Sephora and Ulta Beauty represent two distinctly different digital playbooks. While both retailers command massive influence and loyal followings, they organize demand in fundamentally different ways. Sephora concentrates demand through prestige, curation, and cultural authority, while Ulta Beauty distributes volume through accessibility, clinical credibility, and scale. These opposing strategies shape how brands win online—affecting assortment depth, pricing power, media strategy, and ultimately consumer behavior.

The contrast is most visible in skincare. At Sephora, category leadership is driven by ingredient-led and trend-forward brands such as The Ordinary, Glow Recipe, and Sephora Collection, where hero products range from $6 to $24 and storytelling fuels discovery. Sponsored visibility reinforces high-consideration prestige brands like Drunk Elephant and Tatcha, positioning Sephora as a launchpad for buzzy innovation. Ulta Beauty, on the other hand, is anchored by dermatologist-backed and clinical staples including Clinique, La Roche-Posay, Dermalogica, and CeraVe. Bestsellers focus on barrier repair, sensitivity, and daily-use routines, with paid media favoring results-driven brands like RoC and No7—signaling a shopper motivated by efficacy and consistency over trend adoption.

Haircare and makeup further reinforce this divide. Sephora’s haircare leadership skews toward ritualized prestige, led by Kérastase, Olaplex, Gisou, and dae, with premium price points and sponsorships that emphasize luxury and sensorial experiences. Makeup success at Sephora is fueled by cultural momentum and viral relevance from brands such as Rare Beauty, Charlotte Tilbury, and One/Size. In contrast, Ulta Beauty’s haircare assortment leans professional and salon-adjacent, led by Redken, Kenra Professional, and Biolage, while makeup performance is flatter and driven by high-velocity, mass and masstige brands like Tarte, e.l.f. Cosmetics, NYX, and IT Cosmetics. Fragrance follows a similar pattern, with Sephora favoring mood-driven, approachable scent wardrobes and Ulta leaning into designer heritage and replenishment power.

For the professional beauty industry, the divergence between Sephora and Ulta Beauty underscores the importance of strategic channel alignment. Salon brands, professional haircare, and clinically positioned skincare naturally resonate within Ulta’s service- and routine-driven ecosystem, while artistry-led, innovation-focused brands thrive within Sephora’s prestige and storytelling framework. As beauty professionals and brands plan for growth, success will depend less on being everywhere and more on showing up with the right message, education, and value proposition for each retailer’s definition of “winning.”

Read more about "Ulta Beauty vs. Sephora: Two Digital Shelves, Two Different Playbooks" on Beauty Matter

The article linked above is owned by an external source, and iBeAuthentic is not affiliated with that company. Clicking the link will take you to their website, which may require a subscription to view. (Fun fact: AI helped us write this summary!)

What's Next for You?

From e-commerce strategy to creative execution, iBeAuthentic offers the tools and expertise to help beauty brands grow. Explore our services to see how we can bring your vision to life.

×